Quantum Mechanics Is Spiritual Mechanics
The goal in all of this is to hook people up and give them a Model of Reality that actually matches with reality. I want to help people find the truth. I put a lot of effort into this so that I would have a Model of Reality that actually matches with the Scientific Evidence and the Observational Evidence that we have on hand as a race.
In contrast, the goal of the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, Behaviorists, Determinists, Physical Reductionists, Atheists, and Classical Physicists is to convince people that certain things DO NOT EXIST. That goal is totally worthless. That’s NOT science. That’s religion and dogma. It takes an infinite amount of blind-faith to believe that something DOES NOT EXIST. Furthermore, it’s philosophically and scientifically impossible to prove that something does not exist. It can’t be done, which means that they will NEVER be able to prove that Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and Atheism are true.
These people are tilting windmills, and they don’t even know it. These people are fighting imaginary enemies which are nothing more than a figment of their imagination. They are also promoting pseudo-sciences that are also nothing more than wishful thinking which they have manufactured within their minds out of thin air. There’s nothing tangible within Materialism and Naturalism that we can get our hands on. The whole thing is purely a Grand Illusion. It doesn’t match with Reality, which makes it unscientific to begin with.
When it comes to Scientific Naturalism, Darwinism, and Physicalism, these pseudo-sciences are based exclusively on entropy. Entropy is death, which means that these pseudo-sciences are literally a Dead-End to begin with. There’s NO life there! Entropy cannot produce life. Entropy cannot produce order. Entropy can only produce death. Entropy IS death. Evolution is entropy. Evolution is death. The theory of evolution is Creation by Death. Please explain to me how that’s supposed to work.
One of my greatest and most useful scientific discoveries is that Quantum Mechanics is Spiritual Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics. The proven and verified existence of Action at a Distance falsifies Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Atheism, Classical Physics, and their derivatives. All you really want is the truth, unless you are trying to deceive yourself.
Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Science
I used to be a Physicalist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist. I wasted a lot of time and effort learning concepts that are demonstrably false.
My Atheism was a very dark time in my life. If I can help to prevent even one person from going through what I went through, then it will have all been worth it!
What was the net effect of My Atheism?
It dumbed me down. It made me ignorant. It made me dumb and blind even though I still had a soul or a mind.
I knew that God does not exist.
Atheism makes you believe that you know more than you really do. Atheism makes you ignorant of all the different things that you need to learn and know about. Atheism made me ignorant of Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics. Atheism made me ignorant of Syntropy. I’d never heard of Syntropy. I didn’t know what it was. Atheism of any kind is based upon a refusal to look at evidence. Atheism makes you ignorant. Atheism makes you think that you are smart when you are not. You become arrogant and condescending towards others. That’s the fruits of Atheism, Materialism, Naturalism, Nihilism, and Darwinism. You become dumber than what you used to be. Some people have called it the “dumbing down of America”.
That’s why it took me over 55 years to figure out that evolution is entropy. The theory of evolution is based upon entropy. That’s why it doesn’t work as advertised. It can’t! Entropy can’t design, create, and manufacture anything! Entropy is death. Entropy can only destroy; and think about it, the theory of evolution is based exclusively on entropy. The theory of evolution is Creation by Death. The theory of evolution is Creation by Entropy. The theory of evolution was false to begin with; but, I couldn’t see that nor understand that because I had been educated and trained in Entropy, Materialism, Naturalism, Nihilism, Darwinism, Atheism, and Classical Physics. It made me dumb and blind.
The Materialists and Naturalists deliberately remove the quantum non-local sciences from consideration. These people are actively trying to hide Syntropy, Psyche, Quantum Mechanics, and Supernatural Mechanisms from us. The various different types of macro-evolution, or spontaneous generation, or chemical evolution have NEVER been observed in the wild. They have NEVER been experienced nor observed because they are physically impossible. They are prevented from happening by random diffusion or entropy. The Naturalists and Darwinists are trying to hide these scientific truths from us.
The Physicalists, Naturalists, and Atheists ONLY permit correlational research and experimental research into evidence. They ONLY permit physical evidence into evidence. They only permit the correlational method and the experimental method. They deliberately BAN all other sources of information and knowledge. However, there is also a Burden of Proof Methodology that is used in archeology and the forensic sciences. It is based upon the preponderance of the evidence. We have to use a Burden of Proof Methodology when going after spiritual, supernatural, and quantum realities and forces because we can’t use our physical instruments to detect and record these things.
Correlations indicate a relationship, but that relationship is not necessarily one of cause and effect. Correlational research allows us to predict, but it cannot tell us whether changing one variable (such as social status) will cause changes in another (such as health).
The correlation-causation confusion is behind much muddled thinking in popular psychology.
The great strength of correlational research is that it tends to occur in real-world settings where we can examine factors such as race, gender, and social status (factors that we cannot manipulate in the laboratory). Its great disadvantage lies in the ambiguity of the results. This point is so important that even if it fails to impress people the first 25 times they hear it, it is worth repeating a twenty-sixth time: Knowing that two variables change together (correlate) enables us to predict one when we know the other, but correlation does not specify cause and effect. (Social Psychology, pp. 20-21.)
One of my greatest and most useful scientific discoveries came when I first realized that correlation-causation confusion is behind much of the muddled thinking that’s associated with Darwinism and the theory of evolution. Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Physical Reductionism, and the Theory of Evolution are purely correlational! There’s NO evidence backing their claims that that Quantum or the Supernatural does not exist; and, there never will be. These falsified philosophies or falsified religions are purely correlational. They have NO evidence supporting them. They have to be taken on blind faith as being real and true. In fact, the verified and proven existence of Action at a Distance or Quantum Mechanics falsifies Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and their derivatives. ALL the EVIDENCE falsifies Physicalism, Naturalism, and Darwinism. The theory of evolution is based exclusively on correlation-causation confusion. Fascinating, is it not?
Scientific experimentation has its weaknesses too. Sometimes laboratory research and science experiments fail to generalize to real-world settings. Manufacturing amino acids in a beaker in a simulated laboratory setting has absolutely NOTHING to do with getting entropy and physical matter to spontaneously generate into amino acids in the wild.
Experimental Research: Searching for Cause and Effect
The difficulty of discerning cause and effect among naturally correlated events prompts most social psychologists to create laboratory simulations of everyday processes whenever this is feasible and ethical.
We need to be cautious, however, in generalizing from laboratory to life.
Generalizing from Laboratory to Life
As the research on children, television, and violence illustrates, social psychology mixes everyday experience and laboratory analysis. Throughout this book we will do the same by drawing our data mostly from the laboratory and our illustrations mostly from life. Social psychology displays a healthy interplay between laboratory research and everyday life. Hunches gained from everyday experience often inspire laboratory research, which deepens our understanding of our experience.
This interplay appears in the children’s television experiment. What people saw in everyday life suggested correlational research, which led to experimental research. Although the laboratory uncovers basic dynamics of human existence, it is still a simplified, controlled reality. It tells us what effect to expect of variable X, all other things being equal — which in real life they never are! Moreover, as you will see, the participants in many experiments are college students. Although that may help you identify with them, college students are hardly a random sample of all humanity. Would we get similar results with people of different ages, educational levels, and cultures? That is always an open question.
Nevertheless, we can distinguish between the content of people’s thinking and acting (their attitudes, for example) and the process by which they think and act (for example, how attitudes affect actions and vice versa). The content varies more from culture to culture than does the process. People from various cultures may hold different opinions yet form them in similar ways. (Social Psychology, pp. 24, 28, 29.)
The ONLY way to distinguish between Psyche’s thoughts and the observed physical actions is to accept the fact that both exist and that both are REAL. The Psyche’s choices do indeed correlate with a person’s physical behavior or physical actions; but if we want a fullness of the truth, we must accept the independent evidence or experiential evidence that verifies and proves the existence of Psyche because we are not going to get any of that from physical matter and our physical instruments. We must treat the observations and experiences associated with Near-Death Experiences and Out-of-Body Experiences as Scientific Evidence and allow them into evidence, if we want to find and know the truth about Psyche Mechanics or Quantum Mechanics; otherwise, we choose to remain in ignorance. That’s just the way it is.
The laboratory is NOT a real-world setting most of the time. The variables in our lives aren’t typically controlled, constrained, and manipulated in an artificial manner. Furthermore, a physical laboratory is slow to reveal the existence of Psyche or Quantum Mechanics. It can be done if the scientist is smart enough and creative enough; but, direct observation and experience is a better way for finding and knowing the truth about Psyche, Quantum Mechanics, and Syntropy.
Thought is a function of the Human Psyche. Thoughts and memories are quantum waves.
How do we know?
We know because our thoughts and memories survive the death of our physical brain. We know because our thoughts and memories can’t be detected nor recorded by our physical instruments.
If a thought or memory survives the death of your physical brain, then it’s truly a memory in every sense of the word, is it not?
This is just a small portion of what I learned while studying Social Psychology. Social Psychology is the scientific study of the Human Psyche and its interaction with all those other psyches. Social Psychology is valid on both sides of the veil – both here in this physical reality and afterwards in the spirit world. This is radically advanced science when it is no longer being restrained and limited by Naturalism, Darwinism, and Atheism. Social Psychology has whole chapters on the Self or the Psyche. When it comes time to define and explain the Self or the Mind, Psyche or Quantum Non-Local Consciousness ends up being the BEST explanation. That is what I have experienced and observed. Science is observation and experience after all.
In contrast, Atheism is the making of something by “Nothing”. Atheism is patently absurd. Creation ex nihilo or spontaneous generation is the making of something from “Nothing”. Creation ex nihilo or spontaneous generation is a type of Atheism, and it’s just as absurd as Atheism. Creation ex nihilo assumes facts not in evidence. In fact, it’s contradicted by logic and by evidence. The same can be said of Atheism, Physicalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Classical Physics. They are contradicted or falsified by logic and by evidence. They are falsified by Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanisms.
Do you want the truth, or do you want the science fiction? You can’t have both. The one is true, and the other has been falsified by the truth. The one is true, and the other has been falsified by observation and experience. The false is falsified by the truth; and, the truth is repeatedly experienced and observed. Science is observation and experience – NOT Physicalism and Naturalism. Technically, the “science” behind Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and their derivatives has NEVER been experienced nor observed.
There are as many different interpretations of Quantum Mechanics as there are scientists, from what I can tell.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics
Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics is our most-used, most-verified, and best-proven Science that we have; but, nobody seems to know what it means.
I have experienced and observed the fact that interpretations of Quantum Mechanics that are based upon Physical Matter, Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and Classical Physics completely lack explanatory power and are therefore absolutely worthless.
Quantum Mechanics or Transdimensional Physics ONLY makes sense from a non-local, non-physical, transdimensional, spiritual perspective.
Mark My Words
Source Material
Quantum Mechanics from a Non-Physical Spiritual Perspective
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J023TGU
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521132380
Myers, D. G. (2010). Social Psychology (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
—
Entropy or the Passage of Time
According to the theory of relativity, anything traveling faster than the speed of light experiences NO passage of time. Time STOPS at the speed of light or faster.
Do you fully understand what this means?
It means that everything existing or traveling at frequencies faster than the speed of light is Syntropy. It doesn’t age because there is NO passage of time. In other words, there is NO entropy. Entropy is a function of time. ONLY physical matter experiences entropy or is subject to entropy. Everything else is Syntropy.
Light is Syntropy. There is NO age limit on the Light that has been traveling for 13.2 billion years to get here from the other galaxies in this universe. There’s NO entropy in Light. It doesn’t age, get old, and die. From its perspective, it arrives the very moment it launches, even though from our perspective it took 13.2 billion years to get here. In fact, it has been theorized that Light already knows where it is going to land 13.2 billion light years away, or it doesn’t launch in the first place.
Likewise, Psyche or Intelligence is Syntropy. It is ageless and timeless. There is NO entropy in Psyche, Intelligence, or Quantum Non-Local Consciousness. It is eternal and everlasting, without a beginning of days or an end of years. It is Syntropy. It doesn’t bleed; so, there’s no way to kill it or end it.
We will NEVER be able to accelerate or push physical matter faster than the speed of light because then it would no longer be physical matter, and it would no longer be subject to entropy or the passage of time. It would be spirit matter or dark matter instead. It would be Syntropy. It would be spiritual matter.
Physical matter has been caught in the act of Quantum Tunneling; so, it still retains that inherent capability. If you stop the passage of time or temporarily remove the entropy from physical matter, then you can teleport it or quantum tunnel it anywhere you want in the universe instantly. During the quantum tunneling process, it experiences NO passage of time. It doesn’t age.
Those of us who have experienced Quantum Tunneling or Teleportation KNOW that time STOPS when you Quantum Tunnel. I felt time stop. It was like I had passed out. And then, I was just instantly somewhere else instead, with NO knowledge or memory of how I got there. I and the car I was driving had just jumped, blinked, or teleported. It was nothing that I did, though. It was something that God did for me in order to save me.
The science is REAL, and it’s powerful; and, it’s totally consistent, coherent, and harmonious with itself. It ALL makes sense. The Truth matches perfectly with all other truths. The Truth has been experienced and observed.
Quantum Tunneling is REAL. It has been experienced and observed. The only drawback or disappointment when it comes to Quantum Tunneling is that ONLY God has access to it or ONLY God can do it and trigger it at will. ONLY God holds all the KEYS to Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics. Mortal fallen beings like us aren’t given direct access to these things. God resides within Syntropy. God is Syntropy. Whereas, we mortal fallen beings are stuck within or placed within entropy and physical matter. We age and die. When we die, our psyche or soul is released back into Syntropy.
God imposes entropy, the aging process, or the passage of time onto physical matter in order to keep the physical matter within your physical body from teleporting or quantum tunneling away from you at will. God keeps the physical matter within your body, house, computer, and car from dissolving into thin air by quantum tunneling to the other side of the universe at will. Physical matter still retains that capability; but, God prevents physical matter from quantum tunneling by making it subject to entropy or the passage of time. God deliberately slows the physical matter down to sub-light speeds so that we can live it, experience it, observe it, and remember having done so.
The explanatory power of this Science is through the roof. By choosing to allow Psyche, Syntropy, and Quantum Mechanics in to play, we can literally explain everything that comes our way.
Mark My Words
—
Quantum Mechanics Is Mind Over Matter
I used to be a Physicalist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist.
One of my greatest scientific discoveries came when I first realized that Quantum Mechanics is in fact Spiritual Mechanics, or the way that spirit matter really works. When I first realized that Psyche or a Non-Local Conscious Observer and the Word of Command are needed to convert spirit matter into physical matter, then suddenly the whole of Quantum Mechanics became clear to me.
God must of necessity exist in order to have provided the necessary Word of Command or Conscious Observation, which Quantum Mechanics tells us must take place in order to convert spirit matter into physical matter. The Bible actually tells us that Jesus Christ is the WORD or the Word of Command who brought physical matter into existence in the first place. If God’s Psyche didn’t exist, then there would be NO physical matter.
For me personally, Quantum Mechanics became my first positive Scientific Verification of God’s Existence. The scientists keep verifying Quantum Mechanics or Spiritual Mechanics over and over again; so, it must be the truth, because it’s impossible to use the scientific methods to falsify the truth. Quantum Mechanics or Spiritual Mechanics has never been falsified, although the materialistic and naturalistic interpretations of Quantum Mechanics have been falsified trillions of times.
After realizing that God’s Psyche must of necessity exist in order to convert spirit matter into physical matter, I simply KNEW that God exists.
Here’s a list of some of the books and articles that confirmed or verified these scientific observations for me.
See: Van Lommel, P. (2010). Consciousness Beyond Life: The Science of the Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperCollins.
http://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Pim%20van%20Lommel%20-%20Consciousness%20Beyond%20Life.pdf
https://science-2-0.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Consciousness-Beyond-Life.pdf
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Consciousness-Beyond-Life.pdf
See: Goswami, A. (2008). God Is Not Dead: What Quantum Physics Tells Us about Our Origins and How We Should Live. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads.
See also: Mark My Words. (2016). Quantum Mechanics from a Non-Physical Spiritual Perspective. Kindle. Retrieve from:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J023TGU
The existence of Light falsifies Materialism and Naturalism, and it ends up pointing us directly to God and God’s Psyche.
See: Mark My Words. (2017). God Is in the Light: God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all. Retrieve from:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07168S37N
Quantum Mechanics is Supernatural Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanisms. Quantum Mechanics or Transdimensional Physics IS Action at a Distance; and, Action at a Distance falsifies the claims of Classical Physics or Naturalism which claim that Action at a Distance is impossible and does not exist.
I find it fascinating to observe that the Real Science – the experienced and verified observations of the human race – repeatedly and steadily FALSIFY the claims of Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism. EVERYTHING that we have experienced and observed as a race FALSIFIES Materialism, Naturalism, and their derivatives; whereas, there is NO evidence and can be NO evidence supporting the hidden assumptions or major premises of Materialism and Naturalism which claim that the quantum, or the supernatural, or action at a distance DOES NOT EXIST.
Every time we observe, verify, and catch Quantum Mechanisms or Action at a Distance in the act, those scientific observations and experiences FALSIFY Materialism, Naturalism, Nihilism, and their derivatives such as Darwinism and Atheism.
If you successfully eliminate everything that is false, then ONLY the truth will remain. If you successfully eliminate Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and their derivatives, then ONLY the truth remains.
Physical matter or entropy cannot explain everything that comes our way. Classical Physics, Physicalism, or Naturalism cannot explain everything that we encounter. Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Physical Reductionism, Atheism, and Classical Physics LACK explanatory power when it comes to Action at a Distance, Psyche, Syntropy, and Quantum Mechanics.
Here are some of the articles and books that convinced me that the Materialists and Naturalists are wrong in their assumptions.
Is Your Brain Really Necessary?
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Is-Your-Brain-Really-Necessary.pdf
A brain really isn’t needed for thoughts and memories to take place. Thoughts and memories are quantum waves. We KNOW this is so because it is physically impossible to record our thoughts and memories with our physical devices or physical machines. Thoughts, memories, or quantum waves are NOT a product or epiphenom of physical matter.
Mind Time
https://zodml.org/sites/default/files/%5BBenjamin_Libet%2C_Professor_Stephen_M._Kosslyn%5D_Min.pdf
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mind-Time.pdf
https://science-2-0.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mind-Time.pdf
We continue to think, learn, and remember long after our physical brain is dead and gone according to the scientific evidence that has been obtained from Near-Death Experiences (NDEs), Shared-Death Experiences (SDEs), Out-of-Body Experiences (OBEs), and our after-death Life Reviews. Thoughts and memories are a product of the Human Psyche.
The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force – Jeffrey M. Schwartz, Sharon Begley (2003):
http://publicism.info/psychology/mind/
https://science-2-0.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Mind-and-the-Brain.zip
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Mind-and-the-Brain.zip
Quantum Mechanics NEVER made any sense to me while I was a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist. Eventually I learned that Quantum Mechanics or Action at a Distance is a non-local, non-physical, immaterial, spiritual, transdimensional phenomenon.
When I finally realized that Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics is in fact how spirit matter and psyche work at the quantum level or psyche level, then suddenly it became clear to me what Spiritual Mechanics or Quantum Mechanics is and how it works. Quantum Mechanics only makes sense from a Spiritual Perspective. Classical Physics, Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Physical Reductionism, and Atheism CANNOT explain how Quantum Mechanics or Syntropy works, nor can they explain what Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics is.
The Spiritual Brain
https://science-2-0.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Spiritual-Brain.pdf
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Spiritual-Brain.pdf
These are a few books that you must read and understand if you have a desire to move your Science into the Quantum Age.
These are some of the Science Books that the Materialists, Naturalists, Nihilists, and Atheists are trying to convince you do not exist. They don’t want you to find this material because it FALSIFIES Materialism, Naturalism, Nihilism, Atheism, and even Darwinism or the Theory of Evolution.
Statistics seem to suggest that the majority of scientists and philosophers have chosen to believe in and promote Scientific Naturalism, Physicalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and Classical Physics. NO amount of evidence will ever convince them that they are wrong until they are actually willing to look at the evidence and accept it as being real and true.
But, we don’t need to convince the scientists that they are wrong. We – the public at-large – can skip right past them and figure out for ourselves why they are wrong and how they are wrong. That’s what I eventually chose to do. So long as you have found the truth, it doesn’t really matter what the scientists choose to believe; now does it? All they really need is classical physics and the physical sciences to do their work of saving world – or destroying the world. God holds ALL the KEYS to Quantum Mechanics in any case; and, God doesn’t give us mere mortals direct access nor direct control over Quantum Mechanics anyway. There’s nothing that the scientists can do to get at Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics and use that Science against us or against God. Most of them don’t need Quantum Mechanics to do their work; so, just let them remain in the dark if they want to.
The beauty of Psyche, Syntropy, and Quantum Mechanics is that you can literally explain everything that happens to you and everything that comes your way once you choose to allow them into play.
Mark My Words
—
The Self Does Not Die
The Self or the Psyche does not die. It can’t die.
Why?
This reality and truth just might be one of the most important scientific discoveries that a person can make during his or her scientific career.
The theory of relativity teaches us that at the speed of light or faster than the speed of light TIME STOPS. There is NO passage of time at the speed of light or faster than the speed of light.
Do you know what that means?
Well, being a Materialist, Naturalist, and Classical Physicist, Albert Einstein erroneously concluded that nothing exists faster than the speed of light. He was wrong!
Tachyons or spirit matter exist at frequencies faster than the speed of light.
In a book entitled Physics of the Impossible by Michio Kaku, we find the following description for Tachyons.
Tachyons live in a strange world where everything travels faster than light. As tachyons lose energy [mass], they travel faster, which violates common sense. In fact, if they lose all energy [or mass], they travel at infinite velocity. As tachyons gain energy [or mass], however, they slow down until they reach the speed of light. (p. 280).
That’s the exact SAME definition for Spirit Matter that I have been giving in all of my books for the past couple of years.
Tachyons ARE Spirit Matter!
Tachyons make perfect sense to me, because I’m no longer a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist. At velocities slower than the speed of light, objects take on mass or energy, which slows them down. All of that energy is needed to create the space between the nucleus of the atom and its electrons. Some type of force or field is creating that space-time between the nucleus and the electrons. It has been observed that one has to infuse a lot of energy into an atom in order to raise the electrons to a higher state or a higher orbit. The net result of this slow-down process is that these objects also take on entropy and are forced to experience the passage of time or the aging process. They become subject to space-time. In contrast, if objects lose ALL of their mass, then they are capable of infinite velocities and they experience NO passage of time or NO entropy! Entropy is a function of time.
There’s the truth of the matter!
There’s the answer to life, the universe, and everything. It’s been there all along just waiting for someone to see it, discover it, and declare it.
A photon traveling at the speed of light experiences NO passage of time. From its perspective, it arrives at its destination instantly the very moment it launches. From our perspective, existing at velocities much slower than the speed of light, it took that photon 13.2 billion years to reach us. From its perspective, it took NO time at all.
At the speed of light, TIME STOPS. There is NO passage of time. There is NO entropy. At the speed of light or faster, everything is SYNTROPY, meaning that everything is eternal and everlasting.
The Psyche, Self, Mind, Soul, Intelligence, or Quantum Non-Local Consciousness exists at frequencies faster than the speed of light, which means that it is SYNTROPY. It is eternal and everlasting, without a beginning of days or an end of years.
This just might be one of my most significant and most useful scientific discoveries of all time. It fits and makes sense to me. It’s predicted by the theory of relativity.
Entropy is death.
Why is entropy death?
It’s because entropy involves the passage of time. Things age and die at velocities slower than the speed of light.
In contrast, SYNTROPY is eternal life. The Psyche is eternal and everlasting because it experiences NO passage of time. It doesn’t age. It has NO entropy. That pretty much explains life, the universe, and everything – now doesn’t it?
What’s the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
Well, it’s not 42.
The answer to life the universe, and everything is SYNTROPY or PSYCHE or INTELLIGENCE. The question is, “What is eternal and everlasting, without a beginning of days or an end of years?” The answer is Psyche or Syntropy. SYNTROPY is the fundamental basis for life, the universe, and everything!
Quantum Mechanics is a type of Syntropy. It’s eternal and everlasting.
These realities and truths have been experienced and observed. Science IS observation and experience. Science or observation is an infinitely better way for getting at the truth than just to say that psyche or syntropy does not exist, as the Materialists and Naturalists do. Saying that psyche or syntropy DOES NOT EXIST is a cop out. It’s the way that these people avoid doing the science and the observations that need to be done in order to establish the truth of the matter. It’s an evasion or a dodge, NOT science. These people are avoiding the truth or hiding from the truth rather than seeking for the truth. Scientists are supposed to search for and find the truth; but, these people refuse to do so.
The Self Does Not Die: Verified Paranormal Phenomena from Near-Death Experiences
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0997560800
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01LYMHXCO
Physicalism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism are based upon a refusal to look at evidence. I KNOW because I used to be a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist. We Naturalists and Atheists have to castrate and lobotomize science in order to prevent people from falsifying our theories and our ideas because ALL of the scientific evidence or observational evidence that we have on hand as a race falsifies the claims of Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism which state that such falsifying evidence does not exist.
Science itself convinced me that Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism are FALSE. I believe the Science – the observations and the experiences of real people – and not the philosophical wishful thinking of the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists.
Mark My Words
—
Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
The Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by Henry P. Stapp was the FIND of a lifetime. Henry P. Stapp’s work is important to know about and understand – everything else pales in comparison. This is the information and the scientific evidence that the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists are trying to hide from you; and, they are very good at what they do. I KNOW because I used to be a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist. These people are actively banning, blocking, and destroying this information about Syntropy and Quantum Mechanics because it falsifies Physicalism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and Nihilism.
Remember, Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Physical Reductionism, and Atheism are based exclusively on Classical Physics and Entropy. Scientific Naturalism or Physicalism IS Classical Physics. Quantum Mechanics falsifies Classical Physics, or Materialism and Naturalism.
Stapp seems to be giving everything away for free on his website.
https://sites.google.com/a/lbl.gov/stappfiles/
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/
He seems to be much more interested in getting his message out to the world than he is in maintaining the copyright for his books.
The Orthodox Interpretation explains what the Human Psyche and Nature’s Psyche are doing at the quantum level in order to get things done for us at the physical level.
If your interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can’t explain what the Human Psyche and Nature’s Psyche are doing at the quantum level in order to get things done for you at the physical level, then your interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is absolutely worthless.
Quantum Mechanics makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever whenever it is reduced to Classical Physics, Materialism, Naturalism, Physicalism, and Nihilism. Most of the interpretations of Quantum Mechanics found online and within our college textbooks have indeed been reduced to Materialism, Naturalism, and Classical Physics; and thereby, they have completely lost their explanatory power and their scientific value. Materialism and Naturalism neuter and destroy everything that comes their way, including Quantum Mechanics.
To demonstrate some of these truths, first I will quote from:
NEUROSCIENCE, ATOMIC PHYSICS, AND THE HUMAN PERSON
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/2nd.doc
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Neuroscience-and-the-Human-Person.pdf
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/phys.txt
The Quantum Approach.
Classical physics is an approximation to a more accurate theory – called quantum mechanics – and quantum mechanics makes mind efficacious. Quantum mechanics explains the causal effects of mental intentions upon physical systems: it explains how your mental effort can produce the brain events that cause your bodily actions. Thus, quantum theory converts science’s picture of you from that of a mechanical automaton to that of a mindful human person. Quantum theory also shows, explicitly, how the approximation that reduces quantum theory to classical physics completely eliminates all effects of your conscious thoughts upon your brain and body. Hence, from a physics point of view, trying to understand the mind-brain connection by going to the classical approximation is absurd: it amounts to trying to understand something in an approximation that eliminates the effect you are trying to study.
Quantum mechanics arose during the twentieth century. Scientists discovered, empirically, that the principles of classical physics were not correct. Moreover, they were wrong in ways that no minor tinkering could ever fix. The basic principles of classical physics were thus replaced by new basic principles that account uniformly both for all the successes of the older classical theory and also for all the newer data that is incompatible with the classical principles.
Physical theory was turned inside out.
The most profound alteration of the fundamental principles was to bring the consciousness of human beings into the basic structure of the physical theory. In fact, the whole conception of what science is was turned inside out. The core idea of classical physics was to describe the “world out there,” with no reference to “our thoughts in here.” But the core idea of quantum mechanics is to describe our activities as knowledge-seeking and knowledge-using agents. Thus, quantum theory involves, basically, not just what is “out there,” but also what is “in here,” namely “our knowledge.” Consciousness is thus introduced into contemporary orthodox physical theory, not as something whose existence needs to be explained, but as rather as something whose detailed structure and detailed connection to brain activities needs to be further explicated.
Science must bridge the psycho-physical divide.
The basic philosophical shift in quantum theory is the explicit recognition that science is about what we can know. It is fine to have a beautiful and elegant mathematical theory about an imagined “really existing physical world out there” that meets a lot of intellectually satisfying criteria. But the essential demand of science is that the theoretical constructs be tied to the experiences of the human scientists who devise ways of testing the theory, and of the human engineers and technicians who both participate in these test, and eventually put the theory to work. So, the structure of a proper physical theory must involve not only the part describing the behavior of the not-directly-experienced theoretically postulated entities, expressed in some appropriate symbolic language, but also a part describing the human experiences that are involved in these tests and applications, expressed in the language that we actually use to describe such experiences to ourselves and each other. Finally, we need some “bridge laws” that specify the connection between the concepts described in these two different languages.
Classical physics met these requirements in a rather trivial kind of way, with the relevant experiences of the human participants being taken to be direct apprehensions of various gross behaviors of large-scale properties of big objects composed of huge numbers of the tiny atomic-scale parts. And these apprehensions were taken to be passive: they had no effect on the behaviors of the systems being studied. But the physicists who were examining the behaviors of systems that depend sensitively upon the behaviors of their tiny atomic-scale components found themselves forced to go to a less trivial theoretical arrangement, in which the human agents were no longer passive observers, but were active participants in ways that contradicted, and were impossible to comprehend within, the general framework of classical physics, even when the only features of the physically described world that the human beings observed were large-scale properties of measuring devices.
The two-way quantum psycho-physical bridge.
The sensitivity of the behavior of the devices to the behavior of some tiny atomic-scale particles propagates in such a way that the acts of observation by the human observers of large scale properties of the devices could no longer be regarded as passive: these acts were assigned a crucial selective action. Thus, the core structure of the basic general physical theory became transformed in a profound way: the connection between physical behavior and human knowledge was changed from a one-way bridge to a mathematically specified two-way interaction that involves selections performed by conscious minds.
This profound change in the principles is encapsulated in Niels Bohr dictum that “in the great drama of existence we ourselves are both actors and spectators.” (Bohr, 1963: 15 & 1958: 81) The emphasis here is on “actors”: in classical physics we, and in particular our minds, were mere spectators.
This revision must be expected to have important ramifications in neuroscience, because the issue of the connection between mind (the psychologically described aspects of a human being) and brain/body (the physically described aspects of that person) has recently become a matter of central concern in neuroscience.
The Copenhagen formulation.
The original formulation of quantum theory was created mainly at an Institute in Copenhagen directed by Niels Bohr and is called “The Copenhagen Interpretation.” Due to the profound strangeness of the conception of nature entailed by the new mathematics, the Copenhagen strategy was to refrain from making ordinary ontological claims, but to take, instead, a fundamentally pragmatic stance. Thus, the theory was formulated basically as a set of practical rules for how scientists should go about their tasks of acquiring knowledge, and then using this knowledge in practical ways. Speculations about “what the world out there – apart from our knowledge of it – is really like” were regarded as “metaphysics,” and hence outside real science.
Copenhagen quantum theory is about the relationships between human agents (called participants by John Wheeler) and the systems that they act upon. In order to achieve this conceptualization, the Copenhagen formulation separates the physical universe into two parts, which are described in two different languages. One part is the observing human agent and his measuring devices. That part is described in mental terms – in terms of our instructions to colleagues about how to set up the devices, and our reports of what we then learn. The other part of nature is the system that the agent is acting upon. That part is described in physical terms – in terms of mathematical properties assigned to tiny space-time regions.
Von Neumann’s Process II.
The great mathematician and logician John von Neumann formulated Copenhagen quantum theory in a rigorous way.
Von Neumann identified two very different processes that enter into the quantum theoretical description of the evolution of a physical system. He called them Process I and Process II (Von Neumann, 1955: 418). Process II is the analog in quantum theory of the process in classical physics that takes the state of a system at one time to its state at a later time. This Process II, like its classical analog, is local and deterministic. However, Process II by itself is not the whole story: it generates physical worlds that do not agree with human experiences. For example, if Process II were the only process in nature then the quantum state of the moon would represent a structure smeared out over large part of the sky.
Process I: A dynamical psycho-physical bridge.
To tie the quantum mathematics to human experience in a rationally coherent and mathematically specified way quantum theory introduces another process, which Von Neumann calls Process I. It is a selection process that is tied to conscious experience, and it is not determined by the micro-local deterministic Process II. It is a selection made by an agent about how he or she will act or attend.
Any physical theory must, in order to be complete, specify how the elements of the theory are connected to human experience. In classical physics this connection is part of a metaphysical superstructure: it is not part of the core dynamical description. But in quantum theory this connection of the mathematically described physical state to conscious experiences is part of the essential dynamical structure. And this connecting process is not passive: it does not represent a mere witnessing of a physical feature of nature by a passive mind. Rather, the process is active: it injects into the physical state of the system being acted upon properties that depend upon the intention of the observing agent.
Quantum theory is built upon the practical concept of intentional actions by agents. Each such action is expected or intended to produce an experiential response or feedback. For example, a scientist might act to place a Geiger counter near a radioactive source and expect to see the counter either “fire” during a certain time interval or not “fire” during that interval. The experienced response, “Yes” or “No”, to the question “Does the counter fire during the specified interval?” specifies one bit of information. Quantum theory is thus an information-based theory built upon the knowledge-acquiring actions of agents, and the knowledge that these agents thereby acquire.
Probing actions of this kind are performed not only by scientists. Every healthy and alert infant is engaged in making willful efforts that produce experiential feedbacks, and he or she soon begins to form expectations about what sorts of feedbacks are likely to follow from some particular kind of effort. Thus, both empirical science and normal human life are based on paired realities of this action-response kind, and our physical and psychological theories are both basically attempts to understand these linked realities within a rational conceptual framework.
The basic building blocks of quantum theory are, then, a set of intentional actions by agents, and for each such action an associated collection of possible “Yes” feedbacks, which are the possible responses that the agent can judge to be in conformity to the criteria associated with that intentional act. For example, the agent is assumed to be able to make the judgment “Yes” the Geiger counter clicked or “No” the Geiger counter did not click. And he must be able to report. “Yes” the counter is in the specified place, or “No” it is not there. Science would be difficult to pursue if scientists could make no such judgments about what they were experiencing.
All known physical theories involve idealizations of one kind or another. In quantum theory the main idealization is not that every object is made up of miniature planet-like objects. It is rather that there are agents that perform intentional acts each of which can result in a feedback that may conform to a certain criterion associated with that act. One bit of information is introduced into the world in which that agent lives, according to whether the feedback conforms or does not conform to that criterion. Thus, knowing whether the counter clicked or not places the agent on one or the other of two alternative possible separate branches of the course of world history.
These remarks reveal the enormous difference between classical physics and quantum physics. In classical physics the elemental ingredients are tiny invisible bits of matter that are idealized miniaturized versions of the planets that we see in the heavens, and that move in ways unaffected by our consciousness, whereas in quantum physics the elemental ingredients are intentional actions by agents, the feedbacks arising from these actions, and the effects of our actions on the physical systems that our actions act upon.
Consideration of the character of these differences makes it plausible that quantum theory may be able to provide the foundation of a scientific theory of the human person that is better able than classical physics to integrate the physical and psychological aspects of his nature. For quantum theory describes the effects of a person’s intentional actions upon the physical world, whereas classical physics systematically leaves these effects out.
An intentional action by a human agent is partly an intention, described in psychological terms, and partly a physical action, described in physical terms. The feedback also is partly psychological and partly physical. In quantum theory these diverse aspects are all represented by logically connected elements in the mathematical structure that emerged from the seminal discovery of Heisenberg. That discovery was that in order to get the quantum generalization of a classical theory one must formulate the theory in terms of actions. A key difference between numbers and actions is that if A and B are two actions then AB represents the action obtained by performing the action A upon the action B. If A and B are actions then, generally, AB is different from BA: the order in which actions are performed matters.
The intentional actions of agents are represented mathematically in Heisenberg’s space of actions. Here is how it works.
Each intentional action depends, of course, on the intention of the agent, and upon the state of the system upon which this action acts. Each of these two aspects of nature is represented within Heisenberg’s space of actions by an action.
The idea that a “state” should be represented by an “action” may sound odd, but Heisenberg’s key idea was to replace what classical physics took to be a “being” by a “doing.” I shall denote the action that represents the state being acted upon by the symbol S.
An intentional act is an action that is intended to produce a feedback of a certain conceived or imagined kind. Of course, no intentional act is sure-fire: one’s intentions may not be fulfilled. Hence the intentional action puts in play a process that will lead either to a confirmatory feedback “Yes,” the intention is realized, or to the result “No”, the “Yes” response failed to occur.
The effect of this intentional mental act is represented mathematically by an equation that is one of the key equations of quantum theory. This equation represents, within the quantum mathematics, the effect of the Process I mental action upon the quantum state S of the system being acted upon. The equation is:
SàS’ = PSP + (1-P)S(1-P).
This formula exhibits the important fact that this Process I action changes the state S of the system being acted upon into a new state S’, which is a sum of two parts.
The first part, PSP, represents the possibility in which the experiential feedback called “Yes” appears, and the second part, (1-P)S(1-P), represents the alternative possibility “No”, this feedback does not appear. Thus, the intention of the action and the associated experiential feedback are tied into the mathematics that describes the dynamics of the physical system being acted upon.
The action P is important. It represents an action upon the system that is being acted upon by the agent, and it depends on the intention of the agent. The action represented by the symbol P, acting both on the right and on the left of S, is the action of eliminating from the state S all parts of S except the “Yes” part. That particular retained part is determined by the intentional choice of the agent. The action of (1-P), acting both on the right and on the left of S, is, analogously, to eliminate from S all parts of S except the “No” parts.
The projection operator P is required to satisfy P = PP. This implies P(1-P) = (1-P)P = 0, which says that the sequence of these two actions, P and (1-P), in either order, leave nothing.
Thus, the action P is an action in the space in which the physical system is represented, and it reduces to zero all components that correspond to the “No” response, but it leaves intact the components corresponding to the “Yes” response to the intentional action. The action of (1-P) is the analogous action with “Yes” and “No” interchanged. The action of P is the representation of an intentional mental action upon a physically described system.
Notice that Process I produces the sum of the two alternative possible feedbacks, not just one or the other. Since the feedback must either be “Yes” or “No = Not-Yes,” one might think that Process I, which keeps both the “Yes” and the “No” parts, would do nothing. But that is not correct! This is a key point. It can be verified by noticing that S can be written as a sum of four parts, only two of which survive the Process I action:
S = PSP + (1-P)S(1-P) + PS(1-P) + (1-P)SP.
This formula is a strict identity. The dedicated reader can easily confirm it by collecting the contributions of the four occurring terms PSP, PS, SP, and S, and verifying that all terms but S cancel out. This identity shows that the state S can be expressed as a sum of four parts, two of which are eliminated by Process I.
But this means that Process I has a nontrivial effect upon the state being acted upon: it eliminates the two terms that correspond neither to the appearance of a “Yes” feedback nor to the failure of the “Yes” feedback to appear.
That is the first key point: quantum theory has a specific dynamical process, Process I, which specifies the effect upon a physically described system of an intentional act by a conscious agent.
Free Choices.
The second key point is this: the agent’s choices are “free choices,” in the specific sense specified below.
Orthodox quantum theory is formulated in a realistic and practical way. It is structured around the activities of human agents, who are considered able to freely elect to probe nature in any one of many possible ways. Bohr emphasized the freedom of the experimenters in passages such as:
“The freedom of experimentation, presupposed in classical physics, is of course retained and corresponds to the free choice of experimental arrangement for which the mathematical structure of the quantum mechanical formalism offers the appropriate latitude.” (Bohr, 1958: 73)
This freedom of action stems from the fact that in the original Copenhagen formulation of quantum theory the human experimenter is considered to stand outside the system to which the quantum laws are applied. Those quantum laws are the only precise laws of nature recognized by that theory. Thus, according to the Copenhagen philosophy, there are no presently known laws that govern the choices made by the agent/experimenter/observer/participant about how the observed system is to be probed. This choice is, in this very specific sense, a “free choice.” It is not ruled out that some deeper theory will eventually provide a causal explanation of this “choice.”
Probabilities.
The predictions of quantum theory are generally statistical: only the probabilities that the agent will experience each of the alternative possible feedbacks are specified. Which of these alternative possible feedbacks will actually occur in response to a Process I action is not determined by quantum theory.
The formula for the probability that the agent will experience the feedback ‘Yes’ is Tr PSP/Tr S, where the symbol Tr represents the trace operation. This trace operation means that the actions act in a cyclic fashion, so that the rightmost action acts back around upon the leftmost action. Thus, for example, Tr ABC=Tr CAB =Tr BCA. The product ABC represents the result of letting A act upon B, and then letting that product AB act upon C. But what does C act upon? Taking the trace of ABC means specifying that C acts back around on A.
An important property of a trace is that the trace of any of the sequences of actions that we consider must always give a positive number or zero. Thus, this trace operation is what ties the actions, as represented in the mathematics, to measurable numbers.
[The trace operation, and in fact the operation of multiplying together any two operators, is the quantum analog of the classical process of integrating over all of “phase space,” giving equal a prior weighting to
equal volumes of phase space. Thus, the trace operation is in effect a statistical sum over all of the “loose ends” that are not fixed in the expression upon which the trace operation acts.]
Von Neumann’s psycho-physical theory of the conscious brain.
The Copenhagen approach separates the world into two parts: “The Observer” which includes the mind, brain, and body of the personal observer together with his measuring devices; and “The System” that this observer is acting upon. “The Observer” is described in psychological terms, whereas “The System” is described in physical/mathematical spacetime terms.
This procedure works very well in practice. However, it seems apparent that the body and brain of the human agent, and his devices, are parts of the physical universe. Hence a complete theory ought to be able to include our bodies and brains in the physically described part of the theory. On the other hand, the structure of the theory depends critically also upon the features that are represented in Process I, and that are described in mentalistic language as intentional actions and experiential feedbacks.
Von Neumann showed that it was possible, without significantly disturbing the predictions of the theory, to shift the bodies and brains of the agents, along with their measuring devices, into the physical world, while retaining. and ascribing to the mind of the agent, those mentalistically described properties of the agents that are essential to the structure of the theory. The system acted upon by the mind is the brain. Thus, in this von Neumann re-formulation the Process I action is an action of mind upon brain. Hence von Neumann’s re-formulation provides us with the core of a science-based dynamical theory of the conscious brain.
It is worthwhile to reflect for a moment on the ontological aspects of Von Neumann quantum theory. Von Neumann himself, being a clear-thinking mathematician, said very little about ontology. But he called the mentalistically described aspect of the agent “his abstract ‘ego’.” (von Neumann, 1955: 421). This phrasing tends to conjure up the idea of a disembodied entity, standing somehow apart from the body/brain. But another possibility is that consciousness is an emergent property of the body-brain. Notice that some of the problems that occur in trying to defend the idea of emergence within the framework of classical physical theory disappear when one accepts the validity of quantum theory. For one thing, one no longer has to defend against the charge that the emergent property, consciousness, has no “genuine” causal efficacy, because anything it does is done already by the physically described process, independently of whether the psychologically described aspect emerges of not. In quantum theory the causal efficacy of our thoughts is no illusion: it’s the real thing!
Another difficulty with “emergence” in a classical physics context is in understanding how the motion of a set of miniature planet-like objects, careening through space, can be a painful experience. But within the quantum framework the basic physical structure, namely the quantum state, is essentially knowledge or information imbedded in space-time. Hence there is no intrinsic problem with the idea that a sudden increment in a person’s knowledge should be represented by a sudden jump in the quantum state of his brain. The identification of conscious actions with physical actions is no longer problematic. This is because the old idea of “matter” has been eradicated and replaced by a mathematical representation of an information-based psycho-physical reality.
In this connection, Heisenberg remarked:
“The conception of the objective reality of the elementary particles has thus evaporated not into the cloud of some obscure new reality concept, but into the transparent clarity of a mathematics that represents no longer the behavior of the particle but rather our knowledge of this behavior.” (Heisenberg, 1958).
Conservation of Causality.
The question arises: How can the effect of a psychologically described action be injected into the dynamics of a physically described system without upsetting the causal structure of the latter.
The answer is this: Physicists have discovered an important and unexpected property of nature. It pertains to observable phenomena that depend upon microscopic properties that are in principle inaccessible to observation. In such a situation we are in principle unable, due to the lack of crucial micro-data, to give a complete causal description of the observable phenomena. However, our principled inability to give a complete causal account of the psychologically described phenomena, due to this inherent gap in the micro-data, can be partially offset by introducing into the theory, instead of the inaccessible micro-data, the psychologically described selection of an action made upon the system by an agent.
Thus, the loss of causal determination at the microlevel, due to the limitations imposed by Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, allows an alternative (statistical) causal account to be achieved by replacing the inaccessible micro-data by empirically available and controllable data about human selections of actions!
This feature discovered in atomic science should be equally importance in neuroscience. That is because the basic problem in neuroscience is essentially the same as the one in atomic physics. In both cases the problem is to provide a causal account of connections between experiences that depend sensitively upon micro-properties that are in principle inaccessible. But quantum theory shows how the principled loss of information at the microlevel can be partially offset by using, instead, the controllable and reportable variables of the intentional actions of human beings. Nature left open a causal gap for us to occupy.
The Quantum Brain.
The quantum state of a human brain is, of course, a very complex thing. But its main features can be understood by considering first a classical conception of the brain, and then folding in some key features that arise already in the case of the quantum state of a single particle, or object, or degree of freedom.
Source
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/2nd.doc
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Neuroscience-and-the-Human-Person.pdf
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/phys.txt
https://docslide.com.br/download/link/stapp-mind-matter-and-quantum-mechanics
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mind-Matter-and-Quantum-Mechanics.pdf
https://science-2-0.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mind-Matter-and-Quantum-Mechanics.pdf
Stapp, H. P. (2009). MIND, MATTER, AND QUANTUM MECHANICS (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Process 1 consists of the choices that are made by the Human Psyche.
Process 2 happens when Nature’s Psyche collapses the necessary wave functions and/or fires the specific neurons needed to make the Human Psyche’s choices a physical reality.
Orthodox Quantum Mechanics explains what the Human Psyche and Nature’s Psyche are doing at the quantum level in order to get things done for us at the physical level. This is good stuff! It’s thousands of years ahead of anything that we have gotten from the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists.
If your interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can’t explain what Nature’s Psyche and the Human Psyche are doing at the quantum level or the psyche level, then your interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is absolutely worthless when it comes time to figure out how Quantum Mechanics or Action at a Distance really works.
Quantum Mechanics explains how your Psyche, Intelligence, Spirit, Soul, Spark, Mind, or Quantum Non-Local Consciousness controls your physical body and your physical brain. That’s the purpose of Quantum Mechanics. In other words, explaining Psyche or Non-Local Consciousness scientifically is what Quantum Mechanics is good for. Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics completes science, finishes science, and perfects science. Science is incomplete without Psyche or Syntropy.
For me personally, this is one of the most important, most significant, and most powerful scientific discoveries of my science career. It’s essential. It’s foundational. It changes everything!
If your interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can’t explain how the Human Psyche is controlling its physical brain and physical body, then your interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is worthless. That is what I have experienced and observed.
The Human Psyche makes the decisions and the choices. Nature’s Psyche collapses the wave functions and/or turns on the specific neurons needed to make the Human Psyche’s choices a physical reality. We KNOW that it must be Nature’s Psyche (or God’s Psyche) who is collapsing the wave functions and firing the neurons because the Human Psyche isn’t consciously aware of any of these quantum mechanical processes.
By choosing to allow Psyche, Syntropy, and Quantum Mechanics in to play, we can literally explain everything that comes our way. That is what I have experienced and observed.
I used to be a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist. Quantum Mechanics never made any sense to me until after I got rid of My Materialism, My Naturalism, My Nihilism, and My Atheism. Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism claim that Psyche, Syntropy, and Supernatural Mechanisms do not exist; but, Quantum Mechanics IS Action at a Distance or Supernatural Mechanisms. Materialism, Naturalism, and their derivatives are FALSIFIED by the verified and proven existence of Action at a Distance or Quantum Mechanics.
Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Physical Reductionism, Atheism, Entropy, and Classical Physics CANNOT EXPLAIN how the Human Psyche and Nature’s Psyche are interacting with each other at the quantum level in order to get things done for us at the physical level. Therefore, these “sciences” are worthless, incomplete, and completely lack explanatory power when it comes to the Human Psyche, Nature’s Psyche, Quantum Mechanics, Action at a Distance, Invisible Non-Physical Forces and Fields, and Supernatural Mechanisms.
Materialism and Naturalism have NO EXPLANATION for invisible non-physical forces and fields such as Psyche, Gravity, Magnetism, Nuclear Forces, Radio Waves, Microwaves, X-Rays, Dark Energy, Quantum Waves, Thoughts, and our after-death Memories which have been experienced, observed, and caught in the act.
It’s time for the world at-large to upgrade science to Quantum Mechanics or Supernatural Mechanics. Once you choose to allow Psyche, Syntropy, and Quantum Mechanics in to play, instantly you can explain everything that comes your way.
Mark My Words
—
The Mindful Universe
The Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by Henry P. Stapp was the FIND of a lifetime. Henry P. Stapp’s work is important to know about and understand – everything else pales in comparison. This is the information and the scientific evidence that the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists are trying to hide from you; and, they are very good at what they do. These people are actively banning, blocking, and destroying this information because it falsifies Physicalism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and Nihilism.
Stapp seems to be giving everything away for free on his website.
https://sites.google.com/a/lbl.gov/stappfiles/
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/
He seems to be much more interested in getting his message out to the world than he is in maintaining the copyright for his books.
Stapp, H. P. (2011). Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer. Heidelberg: Springer.
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mindful-Universe.pdf
—
Snippets from the Mindful Universe:
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/Key.doc
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mindful-Universe-Key.doc
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/Book.doc
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mindful-Universe-Booklet.doc
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/Chapt3.txt
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/Chap4-6.txt
—
Quote from the Mindful Universe:
The World of Actions
Werner Heisenberg was, from a technical point of view, the principal founder of quantum theory. He discovered in 1925 the completely amazing and wholly unprecedented solution to the puzzle: the quantities that classical physical theory was based upon, and which were thought to be numbers, must be treated not as numbers but as actions! Ordinary numbers, such as 2 and 3, have the property that the product of any two of them does not depend on the order of the factors: 2 times 3 is the same as 3 times 2. But Heisenberg discovered that one could get the correct answers out of the old classical laws if one decreed that certain numbers that occur in classical physics as the magnitudes of certain physical properties of a material system are not ordinary numbers. Rather, they must be treated as actions having the property that the order in which they act matters!
This ‘solution’ may sound absurd or insane. But mathematicians had already discovered that logically consistent generalizations of ordinary mathematics exist in which numbers are replaced by ‘actions’ having the property that the order in which they are applied matters. The ordinary numbers that we use for everyday purposes like buying a loaf of bread or paying taxes are just a very special case from among a broad set of rationally coherent mathematical possibilities. In this simplest case, A times B happens to be the same as B times A. But there is no logical reason why Nature should not exploit one of the more general cases: there is no compelling reason why our physical theories must be based exclusively on ordinary numbers rather than on actions. The theory based on Heisenberg’s discovery exploits the more general logical possibility. It is called quantum mechanics, or quantum theory.
The difference between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics is specified by Planck’s constant, which is a tiny number on the scale of human actions. Thus, this tweaking of laws of physics might seem to be a bit of mathematical minutia that could scarcely have any great bearing on the fundamental nature of the universe, or of our role within it. But replacing numbers by actions upsets the whole apple cart. It produced a seismic shift in our ideas about both the nature of reality, and the nature of our relationship to the reality that envelops and sustains us. The aspects of nature represented by the theory are converted from elements of being to elements of doing. The effect of this change is profound: it replaces the world of material substances by a world populated by actions, and by potentialities for the occurrence of the various possible observed feedbacks from these actions. Thus, this switch from ‘being’ to ‘action’ allows – and according to orthodox quantum theory demands – a draconian shift in the very subject matter of physical theory, from an imagined universe consisting of causally self-sufficient mindless matter, to a universe populated by allowed possible physical actions and possible experienced feedbacks from such actions. A purported theory of matter alone is converted into a theory of the relationship between matter and mind.
What is this momentous change introduced by Heisenberg?
In classical physics the center point of each physical object has, at each instant of time, a well-defined location, which can be specified by giving its three coordinates (x, y, z) relative to some coordinate system. For example, the location of (the center point of) a spider dangling in a room can be specified by letting z be its distance from the floor, and letting x and y be its distances from two intersecting walls. Similarly, the velocity of that dangling spider, as she drops to the floor, blown by a gust of wind, can be specified by giving the rates of change of these three coordinates (x, y, z). If each of these three rates of change, which together specify the velocity, are multiplied by the weight (= mass) of the spider, then one gets three numbers, say (p, q, r), that define the momentum of the spider. In classical physics one uses the set of three numbers denoted by (x, y, z) to represent the position of the center point of an object, and the set of three numbers labeled by (p, q, r) to represent the momentum of that object. These six numbers are just ordinary numbers that obey the commutative property of multiplication that we all, hopefully, learned in third grade: x ∗ p equals p ∗ x, where ∗ means multiply.
The six-dimensional space of all possible values (x, y, z; p, q, r) is called phase space: it is the space of all possible instantaneous ‘states’ of the particle.
Heisenberg’s analysis showed that in order to make the formulas of classical physics work in general, x ∗ p must be different from p ∗ x. He found that the difference between these two products must be Planck’s constant. (Actually, the difference is Planck’s constant divided by 2π and multiplied by the imaginary unit i, which is a number such that i times i is minus one.) Thus, modern quantum theory was born by recognizing, or declaring, that the symbols used in classical physical theory to represent ordinary numbers actually represent actions such that their ordering in a sequence of actions matters. The procedure of creating the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics from that of classical physics, by replacing numbers by corresponding actions, is called ‘quantization’.
The idea of replacing the numbers that specify where a particle is, and how fast it is moving, by mathematical quantities that violate the simple laws of arithmetic may strike you – if this is the first you’ve heard about it – as a giant step in the wrong direction. You might mutter that scientists should try to make things simpler, rather than abandoning one of the things we really know for sure, namely that the order in which one multiplies factors does not matter. But against that intuition one must recognize that this change works beautifully in practice: all of the tested predictions of quantum mechanics are borne out, and these include predictions that are correct to the incredible accuracy of one part in a hundred million. There must be something very, very right about this replacement of numbers by actions.
In classical physical theory each elementary particle is asserted to have at each instant of time a definite location, defined by a set of three numbers (x, y, z), and definite momentum, defined by a set of three numbers (p, q, r). In quantum theory one generally considers systems of many particles, but insofar as one can consider one particle alone the state of that particle at any instant of time would be represented by a cloud of pairs of numbers, with one pair of numbers (called a complex number) assigned to each point in three-dimensional (position) space. Someone might choose to perform a phenomenologically (i.e., experimentally/experientially) described probing action on this ‘particle’. In quantum mechanics each such possible probing action turns out to have an associated set of distinct experientially distinguishable possible outcomes. The cloud of numbers taken as a whole determines the probability for the appearance of each of the alternative possible outcomes of that chosen probing action. The theory thus gives specified rules for computing the probabilities for each of the distinct alternative possible empirically described feedbacks from each of the alternative possible experimental probing actions that the human experimenter might chose to perform, but no rules that specify which probing action he or she will choose.
In classical physical theory when one descends from the macroscopic world of visible objects to the microscopic world of their elementary constituents one arrives at a world containing the ‘solid, massy, hard, impenetrable moveable particles’ that Newton spoke of. But in quantum theory one arrives instead at clouds, or quantum smears, of numbers that taken as a whole have empirical meaning in terms of probabilities of alternative possible experiences.
Briefly stated, the orthodox formulation of quantum theory (see Appendix D) asserts that, in order to connect adequately the mathematically described state of a physical system to human experience, there must be an abrupt intervention in the otherwise smoothly evolving mathematically described state of that system.
According to the orthodox formulation, these interventions are probing actions instigated by human agents who are able to ‘freely’ choose which one, from among various alternative possible probing actions, they will perform. The physically describable effect of the chosen probing action is to separate (partition) the prior physical state of the system being probed in some particular way into a set of component parts. Each physically described part corresponds to one perceivable outcome from the set of distinct alternative possible perceivable outcomes of that particular probing action.
If such a probing action is performed, then one of its allowed perceivable feedbacks will appear in the stream of consciousness of the observer, and the mathematically described state of the probed system will then jump abruptly from the form it had prior to the intervention to the partitioned portion of that state that corresponds to the observed feedback. This means that, according to orthodox contemporary physical theory, the ‘free’ choices of probing actions made by agents enter importantly into the course of the ensuing psychologically and physically described events. Here the word ‘free’ means, however, merely that the choice is not determined by the (currently) known laws of physics; not that the choice has no cause at all in the full psychophysical structure of reality. Presumably the choice has some cause or reason – it is unreasonable that it should simply pop out of nothing at all – but the existing theory gives no reason to believe that this cause must be determined exclusively by the physically described aspects of the psychophysically described nature alone.
If one sets Planck’s constant equal to zero in the quantum mechanical equations, then one recovers (the fundamentally incorrect) classical mechanics. Thus, classical physics is an approximation to quantum physics. It is the approximation in which Planck’s constant, wherever it appears, is replaced by zero. In this approximation the quantum smearing does not occur – each cloud is reduced to a point – and one recovers classical physics, along with the physical determinism (the causal closure of the physical) entailed by classical physics.
In the classical approximation there is no need for, and indeed no room for, any effect of any probing action. The uncertainty – arising from the non-zero size of the quantum cloud – that in the unapproximated theory needs to be resolved by the intervention of some particular probing action is already reduced to zero by the replacement of Planck’s constant by zero. Thus, all effects upon the physically/mathematically described aspects of nature’s process that are instigated by the actions ‘freely’ chosen by agents are eliminated by the classical approximation. Consequently, any attempt to understand or explain within the framework of classical physics the physical effects of consciousness is irrational, because the classical approximation eliminates the effect one is trying to study.
Intentional Actions and Experienced Feedbacks
The concept of intentional actions by agents is of central importance. Each such action is intended to produce an experiential feedback. For example, a scientist might act to place a Geiger counter near a radioactive source, with the intention to see the counter either ‘fire’, or ‘not fire’, during a certain time interval. The experienced response, ‘Yes’ or ‘No’, to the query ‘Does the counter fire?’ specifies one bit of information. The basic move in quantum theory is to shift, fundamentally, from the airy plane of high-level abstractions, such as the unseen precise trajectories of invisible elementary material particles, to the nitty-gritty realities of consciously chosen intentional actions and their experienced feedbacks, and to the theoretical specification of the mathematical procedures that allow us successfully to predict relationships among these empirical realities.
Probing actions of this kind are performed not only by scientists. Every healthy and alert infant is engaged in making willful efforts that produce experiential feedbacks, and he or she soon begins to form expectations about what sorts of feedbacks are likely to follow from some particular kind of felt effort. Thus, both empirical science and normal human life are based on paired realities of this action–response kind, and our physical and psychological theories are both basically attempts to understand these linked realities within a rational conceptual framework.
A purposeful action by a human agent has two aspects. One aspect is his conscious intention, which is described in psychological terms. The other aspect is the linked physical action, which is described in physical terms; i.e., in terms of mathematical entities assigned to spacetime points. For successful living the physically described action should be a functional counterpart of the conscious intention: after sufficient empirical honing by effective learning processes the physically described aspect of the felt intentional act should have a tendency to produce the intended experiential feedback.
John von Neumann, in his seminal book, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, calls by the name ‘process 1’ the basic probing action that partitions a potential continuum of physically described possibilities into a (countable) set of empirically recognizable alternative possibilities. I shall retain that terminology. Von Neumann calls the orderly mechanically controlled evolution that occurs between interventions by name ‘process 2’. This process is the one controlled by the Schrödinger equation. The numbering, 1 and 2, emphasizes the important fact that the conceptual framework of orthodox quantum theory requires first an acquisition of knowledge, and second, a mathematically described propagation of a representation of this acquired knowledge to some later time at which a further inquiry is made.
There are two other associated processes that need to be recognized. The first of these is the process that selects the outcome, ‘Yes’ or ‘No’, of the probing action. Dirac calls this intervention a “choice on the part of nature”, and it is subject, according to quantum theory, to statistical rules specified by the theory. I call by the name ‘process 3’ this statistically specified choice of the outcome of the action selected by the prior process 1 probing action.
Finally, in connection with each process 1 action, there is, presumably, some process that is not described by contemporary quantum theory, but that determines what the so-called ‘free choice’ of the experimenter will actually be. This choice seems to us to arise, at least in part, from conscious reasons and valuations, and it is certainly strongly influenced by the state of the brain of the experimenter. I have previously called this selection process by the name ‘process 4’; but will use here the more apt name ‘process zero’, because this process must precede von Neumann’s process 1. It is the absence from orthodox quantum theory of any description on the workings of process zero that constitutes the causal gap in contemporary orthodox physical theory. It is this ‘latitude’ offered by the quantum formalism, in connection with the “freedom of experimentation” (Bohr 1958, p. 73), that blocks the causal closure of the physical, and thereby releases human actions from the immediate bondage of the physically described aspects of reality.
Cloudlike Forms
The quantum state of a single elementary particle can be visualized, roughly, as a continuous cloud of (complex) numbers, one assigned to every point in three-dimensional space. This cloud of numbers evolves in time and, taken as a whole, it determines, at each instant, for each allowed process 1 action, an associated set of alternative possible experiential outcomes or feedbacks, and the ‘probability of finding (i.e., experiencing)’ that particular outcome.
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle specifies that if one squeezes this spatial cloud – the spatial region in which the numbers are nonzero – into a sufficiently small region, it will violently explode outward when the constricting force is removed.
https://epdf.tips/mindful-universe-quantum-mechanics-and-the-participating-observer.html
https://books.google.com/books?id=yVpyM3dJOqYC&pg=PA24#v=onepage&q&f=false
Stapp, H. P. (2011). Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
If any of this is true, and I believe that it is, then it completely falsifies Radical Behaviorism and Hard Determinism. It also falsifies Materialism, Physicalism, Naturalism, and Nihilism. The false is falsified by the truth; and, the truth is repeatedly experienced and observed.
The Materialists, Naturalists, and Classical Physicists are right in that there is no such thing as free will or choice at the physical level. Physical matter doesn’t make choices. Physical processes such as random mutations, natural selection, evolution, and entropy don’t make choices. Your physical brain doesn’t make choices because it can’t make choices! Physical matter can’t do choice. Physical matter has no choice in the matter.
But, these people don’t realize why they are right because they don’t realize that choice is a function of Psyche and that every choice takes place at the quantum level or the psyche level instead of the physical level. Instead, these people deny the existence of choice and the existence of Psyche because their naturalistic model for reality can’t explain psyche nor choice; consequently, these people erroneously choose to state that psyche or choice does not exist, and that’s as far as their science can take them.
Materialism and Naturalism completely lack explanatory power when it comes to Psyche, Syntropy, Non-Locality, Action at a Distance, Quantum Mechanics, and Choice.
Mark My Words
—
On the Nature of Things
“On the Nature of Things: Human Presence in the World of Atoms” by Henry P. Stapp.
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/NOT72C.pdf
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/On-Nature-of-Things.pdf
Here’s a free book from Henry P. Stapp that he is handing out to the public.
The important thing is to get this information out to the public so that they can take advantage of it. Most of the scientists have officially rejected this information, so you won’t get any of this information from them. You will have to look someplace else besides our college classrooms and public schools if you want to find this information because it’s being banned from our public schools by the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, and Atheists.
—
Quantum Physics in Neuroscience and Psychology
This article was my first introduction to Henry P. Stapp and the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. I mention and discuss it elsewhere, so I won’t do so here.
Schwartz, J. M., Stapp, H. P., & Beauregard, M. (2004). Quantum Physics in Neuroscience and Psychology: A Neurophysical Model of Mind-Brain Interaction. Published Online: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B.
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/PTRS.doc
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/PTRS.zip
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/PTRS.pdf
http://mypsyche.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PTRS.pdf
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4w8665vk
This paper summarizes everything I have been looking for during the past fifty-five years of my life. That’s a long time to wander in darkness looking for the truth; but luckily, our generation finally has the truth, if we know where to find it and recognize it as true when we do find it.
This paper and Henry P. Stapp’s papers and books taught me what Stapp calls the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, which explains the interplay and the scientific interface between mind and matter.
Examine these two websites, from Henry P. Stapp:
https://sites.google.com/a/lbl.gov/stappfiles/
http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/
They explain the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in great detail. You could spend a lifetime studying them, and still have things to learn.
Mark My Words
—
The Grand Designer
In the book, The Grand Designer: Discovering the Quantum Mind Matrix of the Universe, Graham Smetham gathers together some of the very best from Henry P. Stapp into a very useful and interesting section entitled, “Henry Stapp’s Mindful Universe and the Psycho-Physical Bridge”.
This section is available on Google Books – just page down and up to populate all the relevant pages.
https://books.google.com/books?id=Z0FOAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA158
I also archived it at this link:
https://quantum-neuroscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Grand-Designer.zip
I quote from Graham Smetham:
Henry Stapp outlines his version of von Neumann’s analysis as the following three stages of the quantum experimental process:
Process 1: The ‘free choice’ of the experimental setup. Heisenberg called this phase “a choice on the part of the ‘observer’ constructing the measuring instruments and reading their recording”. This choice is “not controlled by any known physical process, statistical or otherwise, but appears to be influenced by understandings and conscious intentions.” Whilst this process was originally delineated as a phase within the experimental setting, Stapp indicates that such ‘free choice’ of ‘probing actions’ is a part of the general human condition:
Probing actions of this kind are performed not only by scientists. Every healthy and alert infant is engaged in making willful efforts that produce experiential feedbacks, and he/she soon begins to form expectations about what sorts of feedbacks are likely to follow from some particular kind of effort. Thus, both empirical science and normal human life are based on paired realities of this action-response kind.
The hugely significant point in this ‘process 1’ ‘free choice’ is that it poses a question to which ‘reality’ [or Nature’s Psyche] can feedback a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’, and the fact that the choice of the question is free means that the ‘free choice’ actually determines the nature of the possible feedbacks. Thus the ‘free choices’ determine the nature of the experienced reality:
The process is active: it injects into the physical state of the system being acted upon the properties that depend upon the intentional chosen action of the observing agent.
Stapp calls this process 1 ‘a dynamical psychophysical bridge.’
Process 2: The deterministic quantum evolution of the potentialities within the Schrödinger wavefunction, this is the mathematical description of the development of the probabilities associated the potentialities within the quantum realm.
Process 3: This is what Paul Dirac called a ‘choice on the part of nature.’ It is the yes or no feedback from the experimental setup – yes, reality is this way or no, reality is not this way; Stapp indicates that complex questions can be reduced to yes-no choices. This delineation of the experimental process, which starts in the classical realm, then evolves within the quantum realm, and finally gives its answer within the classical level again, is forced upon us because we are limited to perceptions and language within the classical realm. This, of course, is a fundamental aspect of our embodied existential situation which was often commented upon by the early quantum physicists. In other words, we can only ask questions and receive answers in the experiential classical domain whilst the processes which determine the nature of the answer take place in the ‘ultimate” quantum domain.
The Grand Designer: Discovering the Quantum Mind Matrix of the Universe. Graham Smetham.
This three-step process is the BRIDGE between Psyche and physical reality. It’s called a psychophysical bridge. The Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics explains how the Human Psyche and Nature’s Psyche work together at the quantum level in order to get things done for us at the physical level.
This is the answer to life, the universe, and everything.
Process 1 – Choices are made by the Human Psyche. The Human Psyche chooses what it wants to do with is physical body and physical brain.
Process 2 – Nature’s Psyche collapses the wave functions and/or turns on the necessary neurons in order to make the Human Psyche’s choices a physical reality. We know that it is Nature’s Psyche or “Reality” who is controlling all of this at the quantum level because the Human Psyche isn’t consciously aware of any of this quantum mechanical stuff. The firing of neurons and the collapsing of wave functions happen outside our conscious awareness in the quantum realm under the command and control of Nature’s Psyche.
Process 3 – Nature’s Psyche responds to the Human Psyche’s requests by determining what is possible and what is impossible, based upon the physical laws and the quantum mechanical rules which God has set into place. God’s Psyche controls and restricts our access to quantum mechanics, and God’s Psyche made the physical laws. Nature’s Psyche enforces God’s will both at the physical level and the quantum level. God and Nature can read our mind.
God holds ALL the KEYS to both the physical laws and the quantum mechanisms. God is Syntropy.
Try as he might, a fallen mortal physical being can’t do anything that God, quantum mechanics, and the physical laws won’t let him do. God created and enforces the physical laws in order to prevent us from using quantum mechanisms to destroy ourselves and our physical existence. God created the physical laws to prevent the physical matter in our bodies from quantum tunneling away from us at will. The physical laws make physical life possible.
The physical laws force order, structure, restrictions, and limitations into spirit matter or dark matter thereby slowing it down and converting it into physical matter. Entropy or physical law slows down physical matter to sub-light speeds, makes physical matter subject to time or an aging process, localizes physical matter in space, and prevents the physical matter from quantum tunneling away from us at will. The result is the Ultimate Consensus Reality, a physical reality. It is highly reliable, dependable, controllable, predictable, and stable. In a physical reality, I can actually count on this paper being on my hard drive and cloud drive tomorrow when I go looking for it.
Scientific Observation: Anything that began obviously has Someone Psyche or Someone Intelligent who caused it to begin. There’s no such thing as spontaneous generation or creation ex nihilo.
Scientific Observation: Physical matter, physical laws, and entropy began.
Scientific Conclusion: Therefore, physical matter, physical laws, and entropy have Someone Psyche or Someone Intelligent who caused them to begin or made them begin.
It is also logical to conclude that physical matter has Someone Psyche or Someone Intelligent who is currently forcing it or making it obey the physical laws, including the second law of thermodynamics.
The physical laws are NOT an inherent part of spirit matter or dark matter – they ONLY apply to physical matter. Someone Psyche or Someone Intelligent is making the physical laws and entropy apply to physical matter. God’s Psyche forced the physical laws and entropy (an aging process) into a small portion of the spirit matter or dark matter thereby converting that spirit matter into physical matter. God deliberately slowed down the spirit matter converting it into physical matter and subjecting it to the passage of time (entropy) so that we can live it, experience it, depend on it, control it, learn from it, and remember having done so.
Remember, at velocities or speeds faster than the Speed of Light, TIME STOPS – there is NO entropy or passage of time. Light doesn’t age because it doesn’t experience the passage of time, meaning that it has NO entropy. Light is Syntropy. Furthermore, Someone Psyche is forcing the wave functions to collapse into physical realities. This is what Quantum Mechanics is trying to tell us and teach us.
This IS Science at the cutting-edge.
If you consider yourself to be a scientist, then it’s extremely important for you to find, read, and understand this material, so that you can bring yourself into the modern age where science is concerned.
My ultimate desire and goal is to set people free so that they can find the truth and know the truth so that they don’t have to go through a lifetime of darkness like I did.
Quantum Mechanics or Syntropy is thousands of years ahead of what the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Atheists, and Classical Physicists have been able to produce.
Mark My Words
—
Synaptogenesis Is Applied Quantum Mechanics
Synaptogenesis, synaptic mapping, synapse pruning, and synapse elimination are dynamic and alive.
Who or what is overseeing and controlling this process? There’s nowhere near enough information in our genome to code for synaptogenesis and synaptic pruning. Our genes code for proteins, NOT synapses. Our synaptic mapping is taking place someplace else besides our genes.
Who or what is mapping the synapses and deciding what each synapse means or what each synapse does? A synapse has no meaning at the physical level. The synapses can’t communicate with each other at the physical level. Technically, neurons can’t communicate with each other at the physical level.
Who or what is using this synaptic map or synaptic network at the quantum level to get things done for us at the physical level? In other words, who is doing this synaptic mapping, and then using these quantum maps of physical functionality at the quantum level or the psyche level in order to get things done for us at the physical level?
It can’t be the Human Psyche because the Human Psyche isn’t consciously aware of any of these quantum processes. It can’t be our genes because our genomes have nowhere near enough information storage capacity within them to code for and control synaptogenesis, synaptic mapping, and synaptic pruning.
We are in fact looking at Nature’s Psyche and/or God’s Psyche for an answer to the source and the cause of Synaptogenesis, Synaptic Mapping, Synaptic Meaning, Synaptic Purpose, and Synaptic Pruning.
I’m a scientist. I’m also a generalist. I’m good at everything, master of nothing. Among many other things, I have been a computer scientist all of my life. I understand physical storage capacity.
Our genome is capable of storing 725 megabytes to 750 megabytes of information. In order to successfully MAP or NETWORK one quadrillion synapses – the estimated number of synapses in a newborn child – assign a 3D address to each, and then assign a meaning or purpose to each synapse, as well as regulate its synaptogenesis and any synaptic pruning, do REMAPPING or UPDATING or RE-NETWORKING of what remains, while keeping it all straight in one’s mind would require petabytes of information storage capacity to accomplish. It’s physically impossible to shove petabytes of information into our puny 750-megabyte genome. It can’t be done, which means that it isn’t being done.
Furthermore, genes ONLY code for proteins. There is enough memory storage capacity within our genome to code for all the different proteins that are used to make up our physical body; but, where is the information that’s needed to organize all those different proteins into 3D machines and 3D cells being stored? Where are all the 3D blueprints being stored? These millions of different 3D blueprints telling the proteins how to assemble themselves into working machines can’t be stored within our genome because there’s simply not enough memory storage capacity within our physical genome to store all of that information. That, too, would require petabytes of information storage that simply isn’t possible within our 750-megabyte genome.
Who, within a living cell, decides that that particular cell needs a new protein? Who sends the transcription enzymes to the right location in the genome for the specific gene needed to code for that protein? How is that information transferred throughout the cell? Once the mRNA molecule has been made and is on its way to a ribosome, who tells the activation enzymes the correct amino acid to join to the correct codon during the production of transfer RNA (tRNA), so that each tRNA molecule arrives at the ribosome in the correct sequence and at the right time for protein synthesis and the translation process? How is all of this information being transmitted from atom to atom, and molecule to molecule? How would you get two physical atoms to communicate with each other and coordinate with each other? How would you get two or more proteins to communicate with each other and coordinate with each other so as to assemble into much larger nanomachines at the right time in the correct 3D location?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_biosynthesis
These are atoms and molecules that we are talking about here. Who is telling these different atoms and molecules where to go during the construction of amino acids, during the construction of mRNA and tRNA, and during the construction of proteins? Who tells these atoms and molecules where to go? Who tells the different enzymes which molecules to make? Who tells the transcription enzyme which protein is needed and which gene to read? Who is telling the different proteins where to go and what type of nanomachine to become when they get there?
If given the assignment, how would you make the atoms and the molecules communicate with each other and share information with each other at a distance? Remember, there’s NO wires connecting the different atoms together at a distance. Communication between the atoms and molecules takes place wirelessly at a distance.
There’s only one logical answer to all of this.
Have you seen it yet?
Telepathy or quantum waves are WiFi at the quantum level or the psyche level. Quantum waves are the answer to life, the universe, and everything. Psyche or Intelligence produces, transmits, receives, and stores quantum waves.
The Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists assure us that physical atoms are the ONLY thing that exists. They are either right, or they are wrong. Which is it?
Proteins are like tinker toys. The genes determine which shape of tinker toy to produce; but, who or what decides how the different tinker toys should be assembled so as to construct different structures or machines? There’s NOT enough memory storage capacity within a genome to store all the different 3D blueprints for all the different gadgets, structures, and nanomachines that can be made with those tinker toys. The genome only has enough memory storage capacity to code for the construction of the individual tinker toys. So, where is all of that other information being stored for all those different 3D blueprints? How is all that information being transmitted from atom to atom, molecule to molecule, and protein to protein?
Who is transmitting all of this information from atom to atom? What makes these atoms and molecules move from one location to their target location? Who is telling these atoms and molecules where their target is located? How is all of this information being transmitted wirelessly from atom to atom, and molecule to molecule?
Where is all of this COMMAND and CONTROL information being stored, and how is it being transmitted throughout the cell to the different atoms and molecules within the cell?
It can’t be our genes that are storing and transmitting petabytes of this invisible command and control information. The genes are one of the targets of that information but can’t be the source of that information. Our physical genes can’t store and transmit petabytes of information at the physical level through physical mechanisms. There’s no mechanism in place for doing so at the physical level.
So, what are we left with since the source of this information can’t be our genes?
The MAPPING and NETWORKING information for Synaptogenesis and synaptic organization, as well as the meaning or purpose of each synapse cannot be stored within our genome. Furthermore, all the different blueprints for all the different 3D nano-machines and 3D cells can’t be stored within our genome. Command and control information, target location addressing, and assignments for trillions of different cells and quadrillions of different molecules can’t be stored within our genome. So, where is all this information being stored because it clearly must exist and must be getting stored someplace? How is this invisible information being transmitted wirelessly from atom to atom and molecule to molecule since it can’t be transmitted by the atoms and molecules themselves at the physical level? It can’t be our physical genes doing all of this information storage and information exchange because our genes are just another molecule.
So, once again, what are we left with?
Well, think about it logically. Physical information storage or physical memory storage is limited by the size of an atom. Physical atoms take up space. It has been estimated that a genome is about as densely packed as information can be stored in a physical format. It doesn’t get much more optimal than that at the physical level. But, we NEED millions or billions of times more memory storage capacity in the same amount of space that atoms occupy in order to achieve petabytes to exabytes of memory storage capacity within something the size of a physical brain.
The ONLY solution to this conundrum is to go sub-atomic or quantum. You have to go sub-atomic or invisible in order to achieve information storage densities and information storage capacities greater than what’s possible with atoms at the physical level. Physical matter greatly limits information storage density and therefore information storage capacity because physical matter takes up space. Those limitations disappear if you go sub-atomic or quantum.
If you were to choose to store information as quantum waves, you could theoretically store exabytes of information in all of that “empty space” between the nucleus of an atom and its orbiting electron shells. I mean, ask yourself what type of “invisible information” is holding those electrons in orbit in the first place. Positive and negative attract, so there should be NO physical space within an atom; yet, there is. Why? Who is forcing the electrons to orbit the nucleus rather than merging with the protons in the nucleus? There has to be some kind of invisible force and intelligent force doing so; otherwise, physical matter wouldn’t exist.
Entropy is death. Syntropy is eternal life. Syntropy is eternal and everlasting. There has to be some type of Syntropy or Psyche in existence, or all of that subsequent entropy and physical matter wouldn’t have been possible in the first place.
Telepathy or quantum waves are WiFi at the quantum level or the psyche level. Quantum waves or telepathy could be used to transmit information from atom to atom. Quantum waves could also be used to store information invisibly within atoms. Quantum waves or telekinesis could move an atom from one location to a different target location. There is NO answer at the physical level; but, there are an endless number of different answers to be found at the quantum level or the psyche level.
I have hypothesized that Psyche or Quantum Non-Local Consciousness is an infinite singularity. The math points to the existence of such a thing. If I’m right, then that means that Psyche is capable of an infinite amount of memory storage capacity within something that has NO size and takes up NO space whatsoever. Now, that’s infinitely dense information storage capacity that we are talking about there within an infinite singularity or Psyche. That’s infinitely more information storage capacity than what’s possible at the physical level.
Mark My Words
—
Source
Quantum Mechanics from a Non-Physical Spiritual Perspective
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J023TGU
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521132380
NATURE vs. NURTURE vs. NIRVANA: An Introduction to Reality
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01JWRCSVA
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521132615
Reference Material
Quantum Neuroscience: The Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B079Z6QQQB
The Ultimate Model of Reality: Psyche Is the Ultimate Cause
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B071NC9JK6